My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad

November 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

search

  • Google

    WWW
    Toast

copyright (c) 2005 Linda Tobin

Protected

contact me at: lindystoast at gmail dot com

« Terrinerama: Reminder and a Recipe | Main | Plum Crazy »

May 18, 2008

Food 2.0

P1000405Recently, I received several "Advanced Reader's" copies of food books, which is a delightful side benefit of writing a blog, a not-for-profit enterprise- in my case, anyhow. It makes me feel puffed up and important, giant geek that I am. But even better, I get to see lots of interesting new stuff and add to the strain on the inadequate shelf space in my apartment. Life is good.

When invited to preview, I tell publishers' representatives that while I promise to read their book, I cannot promise to review it. I don't review books often, and may well find I have nothing much to say about a new cookbook. If a book is wonderful, or fun, or incredibly awful, I will talk about it, or just let you know it's out there-in case you didn't. Know, that is.

It is a good thing that I am not a reviewer of food books by trade. While I read cookbooks like novels, and have bought far too many of them myself, I am wordless after a preview of most. If you see a book featured here, there is probably a fair amount of enthusiastic babbling or, well, the opposite. I do favor the former, and generally only go after a bad book if I believe the author both influential and egregiously lazy. This is an unusual case, though, because I think something good is in danger of going under.

Warning: In a few minutes I am going to be ungracious.

Food 2.0 presents food by Charlie Ayers, the original, and former long-time head chef guy at Google. Google, in its role as employer, is famous for the wonderful food served to its high tech workers, so good that it keeps them hanging around working, instead of, say, going home.

The book is published by DK publishing, heretofore associated in my mind with cleverly designed, modern travel books, loaded with attractive and helpful illustrations. Food 2.0 is, however, excessively and ineffectually tarted up design-wise. As a result, one might well fail to notice the really excellent recipes, which are delicious, healthy, and mostly very simple to prepare. This guy is clearly a terrific cook- one of those people with a major flair for combining flavor and texture in sometimes new, but not bizarre ways- original, but not weird. His recipes do not require odd ingredients, and can all be made, without excessive fuss, at home.

Ayers has a distinct, neat personality and some very good ideas to impart, but they are not organized in an accessible way for a person who is used to, say, reading books. Perhaps this is an attempt to convey some sort of techie, info-in-bytes kind of feeling, but it is distracting and unattractive, and also, it doesn't work. This is a book, for crying out loud- you can't click on a word for more information. And what is more, there is no index. Even a food magazine, if decent, has an index.

The type-faces and cover photo (of what looks like an dull, ordinary burger-though it is not)- just plain, well, suck. I have no problem with the all-black-and-white interior concept as an idea-it could have been good. But these are boring photos; they are badly composed, as is the type and layout. They make the book look junky, and this guy is not junky- his food is great. It's really too bad. [note: Farmgirl Susan has pointed out (she got an advance copy too) that the final edition will have full color photos. There's a note on the back to that effect, which I didn't notice. I hope that will improve the look of the thing, and maybe that there are some design changes in the offing, too. Couldn't hurt.]

I hope there will be sufficient mass media reviewer interest in the quality of the food, so that it doesn't get lost in the shuffle. This is emphatically not a book I would have picked off the rack to have a look at. I may be a bit of a nut about type design, layout, and the book as a physical object, but I think it is not eccentric to call this one plain ol' ugly.

I am a little surprised at how much I apparently care about this sort of thing. I mean, for example, I am very fond of a number of cookbooks of the spiral-bound, standard production variety, and am not at all offended by their design. They are what they are, and likeable for it. But this one- it's pretentious, in its own casual way, and the design detracts from the text. End of cranky rant.

Anyhow, I'm glad to have the book for the interesting ideas and recipes, and here is one I made for a simple stir fry. I used my last frozen duck breast on this , but chicken breast is specified, and of course, would be good, too. This recipe serves one.51h4tbuvyvl_sl500_aa240_

1 tsp veg oil
1 cup mixed vegs (diced onion, green beans or sliced sugar snap peas, and carrots in small pieces)
1/2 tsp finely chopped lemongrass
duck breast or chicken breast , cut in thin strips
1 cup raw peeled shrimp
1/2 tsp minced garlic
3 tbsps dark soy sauce
2 tsps rice vinegar
1 tsp light brown or palm sugar
1/2 tsp. asian style dark sesame oil
freshly ground black pepper
2 handsful shredded lettuce


In a wok, heat the oil and stir fry the veg for a couple of minutes. Add the lemongrass and duck, and stir fry until the duck has lost almost all pinkness. Add the shrimp, and fry until pink. Add everything else- except the lettuce, cook for a minute or two, and pour over lettuce. Eat this right away! If you want a heartier meal, add a cup of cooked rice noodles along with the soy and flavorings.


I love the lemongrass flavor. I had some cute yellow carrots- so I used both the yellow and orange for prettiness. This is an especially good casual stir fry, though I'm not sure why it works so well. Clever fellow.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/395448/29174098

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Food 2.0 :

Comments

Cookbook design is super-important, so I don't think you're wrong to care so much about it.

Reading a cookbook is all about feeding your imagination, really. You want to see appetizing pictures and parse the narrative of the dish, even if it's just a straight recipe, before you can make the leap to preparing it yourself. If you're distracted by a jumbled design and poor pictures, you're much less likely to make that leap.

I think you're right Lindy, I own a cookbook on which the designers have gone crazy, typeface, index, all designed to shout: hey, we're sooo today. Recipes are great, pics are very clean but yummy, still it's easy to overlook that.

What a colorfull and fun stir fry!

All dishes look very delicious! I am interested in the food culture of your country. And I support your site. If there is time, please come in my site. From Japan
http://food-soybean.blogspot.com/

Recipe sounds good, your photo appealing. I want to try it once I gather ingredients. For now I have filed recipe under Food 2.0 simple stir fry. Does the recipe have a title in the book? I suspect this stir fry works well because of its classic cooking sauce -- garlic, dark soy sauce, rice vinegar, palm sugar (some stir fry recipes forget this simple but powerful touch), and sesame oil (the final kiss). As to there being no index, perhaps this too was due to the copy being an ARC. If not, hopefully your comments will bring about that needed addition.

Finally got my answer from the published book. This recipe's title is Ho Chi Minh Chicken and Shrimp (the duck isn't mentioned; poor duckie, must have gotten red-inked). The final cookbook does have an index and is madly colorful, a little too much so for my browsing comfort. While most of the recipes are on a white background, a number are on colored pages. I find those hard to read, and would ban the practice in cookbook publications if I could. A good many color photos of recipes, not inspired, but they do get up close and show us how the dish looks. Though there is some wild and crazy in the final layout, most of it is mercifully confined to non-recipe pages. The recipes, almost 100 of them, do indeed look interesting. I too doubt that curiosity would have had me pulling this book off a bookstore rack, but now that I have looked it over, I am delighted to know about it. Despite the noisiness remaining in the layout, I think it's a cookbook worth some attention.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Check it Out Here